CRISPR Gene Editing: Medical Breakthrough or Ethical Minefield? 

Health and Gender Policy Brief #167 | By: Inijah Quadri | November 1, 2023

Photo taken from:


Policy Summary:

CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) gene editing, with its revolutionary implications in genetic engineering, stands at the intersection of medical innovation and profound ethical dilemmas. While it offers avenues for advanced therapies in medicine and sustainable practices in agriculture, it simultaneously throws us into an ethical labyrinth. The promises of CRISPR are undoubtedly enticing, but the underlying concerns regarding its long-term implications, especially when it comes to tampering with the very fabric of life, are undeniable.

How CRISPR Works:

CRISPR basically operates as a type of genetic ‘scissors’. It allows scientists to target specific strands of DNA within the nucleus of a cell and make precise changes, either by deleting or replacing specific genes. This mechanism is derived from a naturally occurring defense mechanism in bacteria, which they use to fend off viral attacks. By programming the Cas9 protein to target a specific location in the DNA, researchers can achieve an unparalleled level of precision in gene editing.

Policy Analysis:

The ethical landscape of gene editing, particularly in humans, is multifaceted and contentious. A central debate emerges: does our capacity to make these alterations imply a moral or ethical endorsement to proceed? This was brought to stark attention in 2018 with a Chinese scientist’s announcement of creating the first CRISPR-edited babies, engineered to be resistant to HIV. The aspiration to eradicate a debilitating disease is undoubtedly noble, but the action was met with global scientific denouncement due to the profound ethical implications and the unknown long-term consequences for both the edited children and their progeny.

A further area of contention lies in the potential for “designer babies,” wherein genetic selection could allow parents to pre-determine their child’s attributes, ranging from physical appearance to cognitive abilities. This sparks worries about perpetuating social inequalities, where genetic enhancements become a luxury only the affluent can afford. Furthermore, the philosophical debate arises over the morality of humans determining and potentially commodifying life’s very essence.

In the agricultural realm, CRISPR’s applications are no less controversial. On one hand, the technology holds the promise of producing crops resistant to pests, potentially decreasing our reliance on harmful pesticides. On the other hand, such genetic alterations could have unforeseen repercussions on the environment. A modification in one species might trigger unforeseen consequences throughout the broader ecosystem, potentially endangering biodiversity.

Beyond the contentious spheres, CRISPR technology has facilitated groundbreaking medical and scientific advancements. A significant example of its contribution is in the rapid development of the COVID-19 vaccine. By understanding and manipulating genetic information, scientists could expedite vaccine research, leading to timely solutions in combating the pandemic. Additionally, CRISPR holds potential in treating a range of genetic disorders, offering hope to many patients with conditions that were previously deemed untreatable. Such successes underscore the importance of continued exploration and responsible application of this powerful tool.

Overall, to navigate the complexities of CRISPR ethically, a dynamic and robust regulatory framework is imperative, one that can evolve with the swift pace of scientific discoveries. A collaborative approach is paramount, involving scientists, policymakers, ethicists, and society at large to engage in a constructive discourse. While frameworks like the U.S. National Institutes of Health’s research and guidelines offer some direction, there’s a clear and urgent need for more exhaustive global policies.

So far, the call in 2019 for a global moratorium on editing the human germline, which entails genetic changes that can be passed on to future generations, epitomizes this spirit of international collaboration. Such endeavors ensure that the myriad decisions surrounding CRISPR are not made in isolation but reflect a collective global commitment to ethical progress. And, while progress may be gradual, it is essential that important stakeholders firmly establish personal ethical boundaries to safeguard the future of both humanity and the natural world.

Engagement Resources:

  • Innovative Genomics Institute ( A leading research entity dedicated to advancing genome editing technologies and addressing their ethical, legal, and societal implications.
  • The Broad Institute ( A leader in CRISPR research, providing extensive resources on the science, ethics, and policy implications of gene editing.
  • The Hastings Center ( An independent research institute addressing the societal impact of advances in medicine and biology, including gene editing.
  • The Center for Genetics and Society ( A nonprofit organization advocating for responsible uses and effective societal governance of human genetic and reproductive technologies.
  • The National Human Genome Research Institute ( Offers resources on the human genome, genetic diseases, and the ethical, legal, and social implications of genetic research.
Subscribe Below to Our News Service
PLEASE DONATE to USRENEW NEWS----We rely on donations from our readers to support the news we bring you. Donations of any size are welcome, and will be used to support our mission of providing insightful public policy reporting. Thanks. DONATE HERE

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This